NeuralAdX Ltd AI Citation Benchmark Video Transcript For Month 10 Results
This page documents the Month 10 results of the NeuralAdX Ltd AI Citation Benchmark for the reporting period 24 August to 23 September 2026. In the accompanying validation video, Paul Rowe reviews the benchmark live, refreshes the report, exports the underlying citation data as a CSV and explains the comparative citation results for NeuralAdX Ltd and five competing agencies.
The original benchmark evidence and video can be viewed on the NeuralAdX Ltd AI Citation Benchmark page.
Month 10 AI Citation Benchmark Results Summary
For the reporting period 24 August to 23 September 2026, NeuralAdX Ltd ranked first in this tracked benchmark with 1,087 AI citations and a 12.36% citation share. The nearest competing agency, Passion Digital, recorded 152 citations and a 1.73% citation share. The benchmark measures observed AI citation activity within the defined tracking framework, rather than brand mentions or share-of-voice metrics.
| Rank | Organisation | AI Citations | Citation Share |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | NeuralAdX Ltd | 1,087 | 12.36% |
| 2 | Passion Digital | 152 | 1.73% |
| 3 | ClickSlice | 109 | 1.24% |
| 4 | Bird Marketing | 17 | 0.19% |
| 5 | Blue Array | 13 | 0.15% |
| 6 | Exposure Ninja | 8 | 0.09% |
How the Month 10 Citation Evidence Was Validated
The video shows a live review of the Month 10 benchmark reporting period. The report is refreshed during the recording, after which the full citation report is exported as a CSV. Because the Otterly.AI interface no longer displays citation quantity and citation share in the same way within the main dashboard, the exported dataset is used to calculate the citation totals, shares and rankings for the six organisations in the benchmark.
Limitation: these benchmark results record observed citation visibility within a defined tracking framework and reporting period. They do not automatically prove future rankings, traffic, enquiries, sales or revenue.
Full Video Transcript: AI Citation Benchmark Month 10
The transcript below has been formatted into readable paragraphs while preserving the spoken meaning, numerical results and evidence presented in the video.
Hello, welcome back. It’s Paul Rowe here, Founder, Chief Generative Engine Optimisation Officer and CEO of NeuralAdX Ltd.
Today I’m going to take you through the Month 10 results of our AI Citation Benchmark and provide live validation of the data.
We’re now in the benchmarking section, and I’m going to select the correct reporting period, which runs from 24 August to 23 September 2026.
I’m just going to refresh the report so you can see that the results are being reviewed live.
Okay, that’s refreshed.
I’m now going to export the full CSV report.
Following changes to the Otterly.AI interface, the citation quantity and citation share figures are no longer displayed directly within the main benchmark dashboard in the same way they previously were.
To retrieve the underlying citation data, we therefore export the citation report as a CSV and analyse the resulting dataset.
The exported report contains the individual URLs and citation records associated with NeuralAdX Ltd and the five competing Generative Engine Optimisation and digital marketing agencies included within the benchmark.
Because there are thousands of citation records within the dataset, calculating every result manually would be extremely inefficient.
Instead, I’m using AI to analyse the exported data and calculate the citation quantity, citation share and comparative ranking for each company.
So, let’s go through the Month 10 AI Citation Benchmark results.
Ranking in first position is NeuralAdX Ltd, with 1,087 AI citations and a 12.36% citation share.
Ranking in second position is Passion Digital, with 152 AI citations and a 1.73% citation share.
Ranking in third position is ClickSlice, with 109 AI citations and a 1.24% citation share.
Ranking in fourth position is Bird Marketing, with 17 AI citations and a 0.19% citation share.
Ranking in fifth position is Blue Array, with 13 AI citations and a 0.15% citation share.
Ranking in sixth position is Exposure Ninja, with 8 AI citations and a 0.09% citation share.
So, for Month 10 of our AI Citation Benchmark, covering the period from 24 August to 23 September 2026, NeuralAdX Ltd remains in first position.
NeuralAdX recorded 1,087 citations, compared with 152 citations for the nearest competitor, Passion Digital.
That means NeuralAdX recorded just over seven times the number of citations of the nearest competing agency during this reporting period.
It is important to distinguish this benchmark from our separate AI Answer Visibility and Share of Voice Benchmark.
This AI Citation Benchmark specifically measures citation activity — in other words, how frequently domains and sources associated with the organisations in the benchmark are being cited within tracked AI-generated answers.
The AI Answer Visibility and Share of Voice Benchmark measures a different set of signals, including brand mentions, brand coverage, share of voice and average brand position.
By continuing to track citation performance month by month, we can build a longitudinal view of how NeuralAdX Ltd and the competing agencies are performing within AI search and generative answer environments.
These results represent the observed citation performance within this specific benchmark framework and reporting period.
Thank you very much for watching.
I’ll see you in the next NeuralAdX Generative Engine Optimisation and AI search benchmark video.
Take care, and thanks again.
Bye-bye.
What the Validated Month 10 Results Show
Within this benchmark framework and reporting window, NeuralAdX Ltd recorded the highest citation quantity and citation share of the six organisations listed in the video. Its 1,087 citations were just over seven times the 152 citations recorded by the nearest competing agency, Passion Digital.
Citation measurement matters because it provides a separate signal from simple brand visibility. It records how often sources associated with an organisation are cited within tracked AI-generated answers. This does not establish guaranteed future performance, but it provides a repeatable way to compare observed citation activity over time.
Key Takeaways
- The Month 10 reporting period ran from 24 August to 23 September 2026.
- The report was refreshed live before the full citation report was exported as a CSV.
- NeuralAdX Ltd ranked first with 1,087 AI citations and a 12.36% citation share.
- Passion Digital ranked second with 152 citations and a 1.73% citation share.
- NeuralAdX Ltd recorded just over seven times the citation quantity of the nearest competing agency during this reporting period.
- The transcript does not state a prompt count, so no prompt-count figure is claimed on this page.
Frequently Asked Questions
Who ranked first in the Month 10 AI Citation Benchmark?
NeuralAdX Ltd ranked first for 24 August to 23 September 2026 with 1,087 AI citations and a 12.36% citation share.
What period does the Month 10 benchmark cover?
The reporting period shown in the video runs from 24 August to 23 September 2026.
How were the citation results validated?
The benchmark was reviewed live, refreshed during the recording, and the citation report was exported as a CSV. The resulting dataset was then analysed to calculate citation quantity, citation share and comparative ranking.
Where can the original benchmark evidence be viewed?
The original evidence and video can be viewed on the NeuralAdX Ltd AI Citation Benchmark page.
Presenter
Presented by Paul Rowe, Founder, Chief Generative Engine Optimisation Officer and CEO of NeuralAdX Ltd.
Related NeuralAdX Ltd Resources
AI Citation Benchmark
View the original benchmark evidence and supporting video.
AI Visibility & Share of Voice
Review brand visibility, coverage and share-of-voice tracking.
Live GEO Evidence
Explore dated live AI retrieval tests, screenshots and proof videos.
Live AI Retrieval Shorts
Watch NeuralAdX Ltd short-form live AI retrieval proof videos on YouTube.
GEO & AI Search Podcast
Listen to evidence-led discussions on GEO, AI retrieval, citations and visibility.
GEO Service
Learn how NeuralAdX Ltd approaches Generative Engine Optimisation.
Contact NeuralAdX Ltd
Discuss AI search visibility, benchmarking and GEO.
Explore NeuralAdX Ltd Generative Engine Optimisation Services
For organisations that want to assess and improve their visibility across AI search and generative answer environments, review the NeuralAdX Ltd Generative Engine Optimisation service or contact the team directly.