NeuralAdX Ltd Video Transcript
NeuralAdX Ltd AI visibility & share of voice benchmark transcript for month 1 results
This page records the spoken validation of the Month 1 AI Answer Visibility and Share of Voice Benchmark, presented by Paul Rowe for NeuralAdX Ltd. The video reviews the reporting window from 24 November 2025 to 23 December 2025 and compares observed brand-visibility results shown in the tracking software.
The original video evidence is hosted on the main benchmark page and is not duplicated here. View the dashboard evidence and accompanying benchmark context on the AI Answer Visibility and Share of Voice Benchmark evidence page.
Month 1 Evidence Summary
AI Answer Visibility and Share of Voice Benchmark Results
For the reporting period 24 November 2025 to 23 December 2025, the video states that ClickSlice ranked first by brand mentions, recording 93 brand mentions, 26% share of voice and 11% brand coverage.
This benchmark documents observed brand mentions, share of voice, brand coverage and available average brand position values within the selected software reporting window. It is a record of measured visibility in that framework, not a prediction of future performance.
Reporting window
24 Nov – 23 Dec 2025
Brand mention leader
ClickSlice — 93
Leading share of voice
ClickSlice — 26%
NeuralAdX Ltd average brand position
1.7
| Rank | Organisation | Brand Mentions | Share of Voice | Brand Coverage | Average Brand Position |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | ClickSlice | 93 | 26% | 11% | 1.67 |
| 2 | Bird Marketing | 73 | 20% | 9% | Not displayed in video |
| 3 | Passion Digital | 71 | 20% | 9% | 2.34 |
| 4 | Exposure Ninja | 60 | 17% | 7% | 2.54 |
| 5 | NeuralAdX Ltd | 33 | 9% | 4% | 1.7 |
| 6 | Blue Array | 29 | 8% | 4% | Not displayed in video |
Methodology and Live Validation Recorded in the Video
The presenter reviews the tracking software dashboard to compare the results published on the NeuralAdX Ltd benchmark page with the live output visible in the selected reporting window. The transcript records a prompt-section check, date-range selection, results review and a page refresh used to validate the authenticity of the published screenshot.
Reporting Window
24 November 2025 to 23 December 2025, selected in the software overview section during the video.
Prompt Validation
The speaker states that the prompt section is checked against the prompts stipulated on the benchmark page. No prompt count is stated in the transcript.
Live Refresh Validation
At the conclusion of the video, the presenter states that he refreshes the page live to validate the screenshot shown on the benchmark page.
Measured Signals
The results reviewed in the video are brand mentions, share of voice, brand coverage and available average brand position data.
Limitation: These benchmark results record observed visibility within a defined tracking framework and reporting period. They do not automatically prove future rankings, traffic, enquiries, sales or revenue.
Clean Video Transcript: AI Answer Visibility and Share of Voice Benchmark Month 1 Results
The spoken transcript below has been formatted into readable paragraphs while preserving the stated dates, organisations, metrics, result values and validation claims.
Hello and welcome back.
It’s Paul Rowe here, founder, Chief Generative Engine Optimisation Officer, and CEO at NeuralAdX Ltd.
I’m going to take you through the software to validate the AI visibility & share of voice benchmarking results published on our website. We’re reviewing the period from the 24th of November 2025 to the 23rd of December 2025.
If we look at the screen now, you can see I’m in the prompt section. This is to validate that the prompts are exactly the same as those stipulated on the AI Visibility & share of voice Benchmark page.
If we move to the overview section, I can select the specific dates mentioned — the 24th of November to the 23rd of December. Here we have all the results.
We can see brand coverage over time, brand mentions, share of voice, and average brand position. In this software, most of the metrics are consolidated here, apart from the average brand position, which we’ll come back to shortly.
As we can see, in first place is ClickSlice with 93 brand mentions, 26 percent share of voice, and 11 percent brand coverage. Bird Marketing is in second position with 73 brand mentions, 20 percent share of voice, and 9 percent brand coverage.
In third place is Passion Digital with 71 brand mentions, 20 percent share of voice, and 9 percent brand coverage. In fourth position is Exposure Ninja with 60 brand mentions, 17 percent share of voice, and 7 percent brand coverage.
In fifth place is ourselves, NeuralAdX Ltd, with 33 brand mentions, 9 percent share of voice, and 4 percent brand coverage. In sixth position is Blue Array with 29 brand mentions, 8 percent share of voice, and 4 percent brand coverage.
Now moving to the average brand position. NeuralAdX Ltd achieved an average brand position of 1.7. ClickSlice achieved 1.67. Passion Digital achieved 2.34. Exposure Ninja achieved 2.54.
With this Otterly.ai software, the final two agencies are not included in the average brand position section. I have emailed them for clarification but have not received a response at this time. Either way, this is the data we are working with.
To conclude, I’m refreshing the page live to validate that the screenshot shown on the NeuralAdX Ltd AI Visibility Benchmark page is authentic. This confirms that the data published on the website reflects the live output from the software.
Thank you very much for watching. As ever, I look forward to seeing you in the next one. Thank you very much. Bye bye.
What the Validated Month 1 Results Show
Within the reporting window of 24 November to 23 December 2025, the video presents ClickSlice as the leading organisation by brand mentions, with 93 mentions and 26% share of voice. NeuralAdX Ltd is shown in fifth position by brand mentions with 33 mentions, 9% share of voice and 4% brand coverage, while its displayed average brand position is 1.7.
This evidence matters because AI visibility cannot be assessed from a single claim alone. The video identifies the reporting period, checks the prompt area against the stated benchmark page, reviews the dashboard metrics and records a live refresh intended to confirm that the published screenshot reflects the software output being shown.
The results should be read as a time-bound benchmark observation. They document comparative visibility signals during one measured period and do not establish guaranteed future AI exposure, search performance or commercial outcomes.
Key Takeaways from the Video Evidence
- The Month 1 reporting period shown in the transcript is 24 November 2025 to 23 December 2025.
- The video presents ClickSlice in first place by brand mentions with 93 brand mentions, 26% share of voice and 11% brand coverage.
- NeuralAdX Ltd is stated to have recorded 33 brand mentions, 9% share of voice, 4% brand coverage and an average brand position of 1.7.
- The presenter reviews the software dashboard and performs a live refresh to validate that the screenshot on the benchmark page reflects the live output shown.
- Average brand position values for Bird Marketing and Blue Array are not displayed in the video, and the number of tracked prompts is not stated in the transcript.
Frequently Asked Questions
Who ranked first in the Month 1 benchmark results shown?
ClickSlice is stated to be in first place by brand mentions, with 93 brand mentions, 26% share of voice and 11% brand coverage.
What reporting period does the video cover?
The video reviews results for the period from 24 November 2025 to 23 December 2025.
How were the published results validated in the video?
The presenter checks the prompt section, selects the stated date range, reviews the dashboard metrics and refreshes the page live to validate the screenshot shown on the benchmark page.
Where can the original video evidence be viewed?
The original video evidence can be viewed on the AI Answer Visibility and Share of Voice Benchmark page.
Presenter
This benchmark validation video is presented by Paul Rowe, Founder, Chief Generative Engine Optimisation Officer and CEO of NeuralAdX Ltd.
Related NeuralAdX Ltd Resources
AI Answer Visibility and Share of Voice Benchmark
View the original benchmark evidence page and the video evidence referenced by this transcript.
AI Citation Benchmark
Explore NeuralAdX Ltd evidence tracking observed AI citation visibility over defined reporting periods.
Proof That Generative Engine Optimisation Works
Review NeuralAdX Ltd live screen-recorded retrieval test evidence and supporting context.
Generative Engine Optimisation Service
Read how NeuralAdX Ltd approaches evidence-led Generative Engine Optimisation work.
Explore Evidence-Led Generative Engine Optimisation
Review the NeuralAdX Ltd Generative Engine Optimisation Service page to understand the approach, or contact the team to discuss your organisation’s AI visibility requirements.